Sepsis Research - Septicemia, Diagnosis, Symptoms, Treatment

Sepsis Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Sepsis, including details on septicemia, diagnosis, symptoms, treatment.


Sepsis Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Sepsis

Books on Sepsis

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Comparative effects of propofol vs dexmedetomidine on cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity in patients with septic shock.

Kadoi Y, Saito S, Kawauchi C, Hinohara H, Kunimoto F

Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan. kadoi@med.gunma-u.ac.jp

BACKGROUND: The use of sedative drugs is reportedly related to altered cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity. The present study examined the comparative effects of propofol vs dexmedetomidine on cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity in patients with septic shock. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with septic shock who required mechanical ventilation were included in this study. Sedation during mechanical ventilation was maintained using either propofol or dexmedetomidine. A 2.5 MHz pulsed transcranial Doppler probe was attached to the head of the patient at the right temporal window for continuous measurement of mean blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (V(mca)). After establishing baseline values of V(mca) and cardiovascular haemodynamics, end-tidal CO2 was increased by decreasing ventilatory frequency by 5-8 bpm. RESULTS: The absolute and relative CO2 reactivity values in patients with septic shock were lower for both propofol and dexmedetomidine than those for control groups, with significant differences between these values in the two septic shock groups (absolute CO2 reactivity in septic shock under propofol: 2.6 (sd 0.3) cm s(-1) mm Hg(-1); absolute CO2 reactivity in septic shock under dexmedetomidine: 2.0 (0.3) cm s(-1) mm Hg(-1); P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity was lower under dexmedetomidine sedation than under propofol sedation during almost identical sedation in patients with septic shock.

Published 23 January 2008 in Br J Anaesth, 100(2): 224-9.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Sepsis Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Sepsis Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Sepsis Books

Chirurgische Intensivmedizin: Kompendium für die Praxis

Chirurgische Intensivmedizin: Kompendium für die Praxis