Sepsis Research - Septicemia, Diagnosis, Symptoms, Treatment

Sepsis Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Sepsis, including details on septicemia, diagnosis, symptoms, treatment.


Sepsis Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Sepsis

Books on Sepsis

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Differential quantitative blood cultures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections associated with short- and long-term catheters: a prospective study.

Chatzinikolaou I, Hanna H, Hachem R, Alakech B, Tarrand J, Raad I

The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

We prospectively evaluated the value of two levels of differential quantitative blood culture (DQBC) ratio (> or =2:1 or > or =5:1) in diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients with malignancy that have short-term and long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) (<30 and > or =30 days of placement). Diagnosis of CRBSIs was based on results of semiquantitative cultures of removed catheters. For short-term CVCs a 5:1 or greater DQBC ratio had an 18% sensitivity, 67% specificity, 18% positive predictive value (PPV) and 67% negative predictive value (NPV), whereas a 2:1 or greater cut-off point for the DQBC was associated with a 45% sensitivity, 48% specificity, 26% PPV, and 68% NPV for the diagnosis of CRBSIs. For long-term CVCs, a cut-off point of 5:1 or greater of the DQBC had an 81% sensitivity, 40% specificity, 36% PPV, and 83% NPV for the diagnosis of CRBSIa, whereas a 2:1 or greater cut-off point had a 90% sensitivity, 30% specificity, 35% PPV, and 88% NPV for the diagnosis of CRBSIs. In conclusion, DQBCs are not diagnostic of CRBSIs for short-term CVCs. In long-term CVCs, DQBCs at 2:1 or greater or 5:1 or greater are sensitive but associated with low specificity and positive predictive value.

Published 15 November 2004 in Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 50(3): 167-72.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Sepsis Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Sepsis Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Sepsis Books

Immune Response in the Critically Ill (Update in Intensive Care Medicine)

Immune Response in the Critically Ill (Update in Intensive Care Medicine)